Configuration Control Board Charter

In conclusion, using the right tools and techniques can significantly improve the quality, speed, and accuracy of CCB decisions. The CCB may, from time to time, establish technical working groups (TWG), as required, to oversee, review, and make recommendations to the board on specific technical aspects of the CM Program, or configuration items. TWGs provide the subject-matter expertise necessary to ensure that documents, the DM2, and other products under configuration control of the CCB are maintained in a responsible manner. TWGs, when tasked by the CCB, provide detailed and comprehensive technical review of proposed changes and recommendations to the CCB on action(s) to be taken that result from recommended changes. Each element of the structural configuration must be specified to support software implementation. These specifications represent the technical requirements for the design, code generation, testing, and integration of structural units and components.

configuration control boards

The MATLAB function, hinfmix in the LMI toolbox, originally designed for mixed H2/H∞ problem has been slightly modified for the generalised-H2/H∞ problem in (2). Two multiobjective Pareto diagrams, the minimum ||Tuw||g against α-stability and the minimum ||Tuw||g against the minimum ||Tew||∞ are to be produced by repeatedly calling the modified MATLAB function. The dynamic comparison of the manipulated and controlled variables for this control solution and the default BSM1 control is reported in Figures 2 and 3 for a period of approximately 10 days corresponding to low temperature weather in the long term data. Both permanent members of the CCB and members of all technical working groups are notified about all CCB meetings and all scheduled TWG sessions, as are the Combatant Commands and Defense Agencies. During the middle of the project, your contractor for steel work walks off the job and you have to find a replacement. You find an alternative, but the new contractor will not start working on your project for a week.

Step one, PR review:

Anyone can raise a change request but it must be approved by the project manager or a higher authority, as mentioned in the configuration or change management plan. If the client is not involved in the process, their consent is required to implement the change request. At every meeting, the Change Advisory Board reviews requested changes using a standard evaluation framework. That framework should consider all dimensions of the change, including service and technical components, business and customer alignment, and compliance and risk. The CAB must also look for conflicting requests—these cases in particular require CAB members to maintain holistic, business-outcomes views that don’t favor the particular team or individual seeking the change. The main difference between the change management and configuration management systems is that change management deals with process, plans, and baselines, while configuration management deals with product specifications.

configuration control boards

You will handle this change under the configuration management system because here the specifications of your product have changed. Earlier the school building had ten rooms, and now it will have fifteen rooms. Please note that change management and configuration management are the most important concepts for the PMP exam, and you are going to see many questions on them. In the second category, you manage changes related to product scope, which is known as configuration management.

5 Establish the functional architecture

In other words, when a problem occurred did it have the latest group of hardware modifications? The answers to these questions can help identify system problem sources. This is achieved by increasing the dissolved oxygen in Z2 and decreasing it in zone Z3 and zone Z4. The DMC controlled variables are the ammonia concentration in Z5 and the nitrate concentration in Z2. The different DMC configurations obtained with different choice of the manipulated inputs are reported in Table 1. For each configuration the set-points of Z2-SNO and Z2-SNH were both set equal to 1 mgN/L, p was set equal to 10 and q equal to 4.

  • Using these methods, you can avoid many of the pitfalls of traditional waterfall practices described above.
  • Automated tests are run on any code corrections via a PR and PR review to the release branch.
  • The first step in breaking down those higher-order outcomes is to create user stories that describe the outcome someone using your product or process is looking for and why they want that outcome.
  • Overall, a well-managed DevOps process will mean you have less downtime and higher availability of your systems because smaller deploys are less likely to cause problems.
  • Finally, testing and monitoring makes sure that problems are caught and fixed early in the development process.

This plan is submitted when each version or update to the Architectural Description is submitted to DARS for registration and discovery. In developing CM processes for Architectural Descriptions it is recommended that best practices be adopted such as those outlined in Electronic Industries Alliance (EIA) Standard EA-649. This a flexible, but well-defined standard employed most often at the enterprise level. Its flexibility lies in the ability to provide CM practices that can be selectively applied to the degree necessary for each of the areas to be covered under this plan. This request is reviewed by the project manager and then forwarded to the concerned higher authority for their review and approval.


In H∞ control design, a multiobjective performance specification is usually treated as a mixed sensitivity design problem, such as mixed S-KS, or mixed S-T objectives with suitable weighting functions. However, for the controllability configuration control boards analysis purpose, the multiple H∞ norms are better to be considered simultaneously as a multiobjective optimisation problem. The multiobjective H∞ optimisation can be solved by recently developed LMI techniques.

For example, you run out of money and you need additional funding to complete the project, therefore, you will raise a change request for additional funds. Or, you may not be able to complete your project within the specified time and require a time extension. According to the PMBOK Guide 6th edition, “Change Control is focused on identifying, documenting and controlling changes to the project and the project baselines”. Change management is a well-known term in project management but configuration management is not. In the IT field, the term ‘configuration management’ is used frequently, so if you are not in this industry, you may face issues with understanding the concept. Roadmaps are a great starting point but it is important to remember that they  are not a list of requirements—the point of agile development is to make changes as you learn more about your users, problem space, and the other realities of your project.

The Difference Between Change Management and Configuration Management Systems

We have compliance standards in government that we need to document to show we are making choices and changes responsibly. When it comes to management and control of changes to services and service components, one of the biggest challenges is determining who has the authority to make change decisions. Configuration control, which includes the systematic proposal, justification, evaluation, coordination, approval, or disapproval of all proposed changes to the CIs after the baseline(s) for the CIs has been established. If you encounter difficulties in finding a laravel specialist for your startup or existing business, our team will come to the rescue!

The model P, is constructed from the blocks Gn, Wu and Wp representing a nominal description of the process under control, a bi-proper weight function describing the uncertainty of the nominal model and a bi-proper performance weight function respectively. The state vectors of the three individual blocks are assumed to be available for control and are stacked as the vector x. P can be described by the difference equations (1) and is used as the internal model of the MPC. The block △ and Kfv represent the norm bounded perturbation matrix and the favourite controller respectively.

4 Design manifestation

There was no change to the product, the change was only needed in the schedule baseline; the school building was the same, but you will hand over this building to the client one week later. Therefore, you will raise a change request for a one-week extension of the schedule through the change management system. Configuration management documents how you will monitor and control changes.

configuration control boards

A configuration control board (CCB) is a group of stakeholders that reviews and approves proposed changes to the CIs, ensuring that they are aligned with the project objectives, requirements, and standards. CCB meetings and reviews are essential for effective CM, but they can also be challenging, time-consuming, and prone to conflicts. Through the configuration control process, the full impact of proposed
engineering changes and deviations is identified and accounted for
in their implementation. The structural design configuration should be placed under technical configuration control to prevent the introduction of inadvertent changes. Every element of the structural configuration should be uniquely identified per approved software configuration control procedures. From this point forward, only change requests or proposals that have been approved by the software change control board (CCB) should be integrated into the structural configuration.

DevOps on the new site

All content on this website, including dictionary, thesaurus, literature, geography, and other reference data is for informational purposes only. This information should not be considered complete, up to date, and is not intended to be used in place of a visit, consultation, or advice of a legal, medical, or any other professional. This problem is ready to be solved by the off- shelf software (Gahinet et al. 1995).

Leave a Comment